Fanaticism: When Belief Consumes Your Identity

⏱️ Reading time: 8 min

Have you ever found yourself defending an idea, a team, or a belief with an intensity that, in hindsight, seemed disproportionate? A passion that overshadowed debate, silenced inner doubts, and turned any disagreement into a personal affront. In an increasingly polarized world, where digital and physical tribes demand our unconditional loyalty, it is crucial to understand the fine line between healthy conviction and the precipice of fanaticism. This is not a phenomenon restricted to extremists or caricatured figures. Fanaticism is a subtle and powerful psychological process that can infiltrate any area of our lives, from religion and politics to sports and consumerism, with an invisible cost to our mental health.

Fanaticism goes far beyond passion or fervent dedication. It is a psychological and social state characterized by rigid and inflexible adherence to a set of beliefs, ideas, or a group identity, accompanied by significant hostility towards those outside the group. While conviction is open to dialogue, fanaticism suppresses it. While belonging welcomes, fanaticism excludes. This state does not arise from nothing; it is fueled by deep and legitimate human needs, which, when distorted, create a dangerous trap for the self.

The Thirst to Belong: The Psychological Fuel of Fanaticism

At the heart of the fanatical impulse lies one of the most fundamental forces of human psychology: the need to belong. We are social beings, wired to seek connection, meaning, and validation within a group. For someone facing loneliness, an existential void, or an identity weakened by trauma or insecurities, the promise of a cohesive group with absolute purpose can be irresistible.

This is where the psychological hijacking occurs. A fanatical group—whether religious, political, or a sports fandom—offers simple answers to complex questions, a clear enemy to channel rage, and a ready-made and powerful identity to replace a wavering self. In exchange for loyalty, it provides an instant sense of community, purpose, and self-esteem. However, this initial relief has a hidden price: the gradual dissolution of individual identity. The “I” begins to merge with the “we.” The group’s thoughts become your thoughts. The group’s enemies become your enemies. The personal need to belong is satisfied, but at the cost of cognitive and emotional autonomy.

The Mechanism of Identity Fusion: The Self That Disappears into the We

This fusion process is facilitated by well-documented psychological mechanisms. Deindividuation — a psychological state of loss of self-awareness and sense of individual responsibility that occurs when one is immersed in a group — reduces inhibitions and critical thinking. It is the phenomenon that explains why people in a crowd or online under anonymity can act in ways they never would alone. Social cognition becomes polarized: the in-group is seen as wholly good, virtuous, and victimized, while the out-group is seen as bad, corrupt, and threatening.

This dynamic creates a closed mental ecosystem. Doubt is treated as betrayal. Contradictory information is ignored or distorted (confirmation bias). The group’s language, rituals, and symbols constantly reinforce the boundaries between “us” and “them.” The result is groupthink, where cohesion and loyalty are valued more than factual accuracy or individual well-being. The person is no longer defending an idea; they are defending themselves, as their identity is now inextricably linked to that of the group.

The Invisible Cost: Mental Health in a State of Permanent Warfare

Living in a state of identity fusion and vigilant hostility is mentally and emotionally exhausting. The body’s stress system is chronically activated, in an “us against the world” mode. This can lead to:

Constant anxiety and hypervigilance: The need to defend the group and be alert to threats (real or perceived) generates a state of permanent tension.
Emotional exhaustion from anger: Continuous hostility consumes an enormous amount of psychic energy.
Progressive social isolation: Relationships with people from the “outside” are severed or become strained, reducing genuine and diversified social support.
Identity crisis and emptiness: If the connection to the group is shaken (by a doubt, a scandal, a defeat), the person may face a collapse of the self, feeling empty, directionless, and deeply betrayed.
Difficulty with emotional self-regulation: Dependence on the group for validation and meaning hinders the development of healthy internal resources to deal with uncertainty and adversity.

Far from being a sign of psychological strength, fanaticism is often a symptom of unhealed wounds and unmet needs. It masks fragility with the attire of absolute certainty.

Breaking the Fusion: Reclaiming the Self and Finding Healthy Belonging

Undoing the bonds of fanaticism does not mean abandoning all beliefs or passions. It means rebuilding the psychological distance between the “I” and the “we”, reclaiming autonomy of thought and the ability to relate to the different without hostility. It is a path of courage, as it involves questioning what provides security and identity.

The first step is compassionate self-knowledge. To investigate: what deep need is this group fulfilling in me? Is it belonging? Purpose? Protection from uncertainty? Acknowledging this need is the first step to satisfying it in healthier, more integrated ways.

Practical Exercise: The Map of My Tribe and the Boundaries of My Self

This exercise aims to help you map your own participation in groups and beliefs, identifying points of identity fusion and reconnecting with your authentic thoughts and values.

Part 1: The Fusion Diagnosis

Identify Your “Tribes”: List the groups or causes with which you most identify (e.g., your religion, political party, favorite team, social movement, fandom). Next to each, note a core belief of that group that you ardently defend.
Test the Rigidity: For each belief listed, ask yourself: “Could I have a calm and curious conversation with someone who deeply disagrees with this, without feeling personally attacked or trying to ‘win’ the argument?” Note your honest internal reactions.
Trace the Underlying Emotion: When you think of someone who criticizes or rejects one of these groups, what is the primary emotion that arises? Anger? Fear? Sadness? Try to connect that emotion to a personal need (e.g., fear of being excluded, anger at feeling my worth is disrespected).

Part 2: The Reconnection with the Self

Separate the “I” from the “We”: Choose ONE of the beliefs from step 1. On a paper, make two columns. In the “The Group Says” column, write the group’s standard arguments. In the “I Believe” column, rewrite these arguments in your own words, adding nuances, doubts, or personal conditions that you don’t normally express within the group.
Cultivate an “Expanded Belonging”: Think of an activity or interest you have that is not linked to any of these intense “tribes” (e.g., cooking, birdwatching, a solitary hobby). Commit to dedicating time to that activity this week, focusing on the internal experience of pleasure or curiosity, without the need to perform for a group.
Practice Disarmed Listening: Find content (an article, a video, a podcast) that represents a view opposite to yours on a low-emotional-charge topic. Your sole goal is to listen and summarize for yourself, in one sentence, the central point of the other side, without commenting, refuting, or judging. Observe the difficulty of the exercise.

Reflecting on this mechanism of identity fusion, in which area of your life do you perceive that the line between “what I think” and “what my group thinks” may be most blurred? And, by practicing the separation between the “I” and the “We,” what small personal nuance did you rediscover or feel relieved to be able to acknowledge?

For further information, check out these references:

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations. This classic work presents Social Identity Theory, fundamental to understanding how we categorize ourselves into groups and derive self-esteem from them.
Kruglanski, A. W., et al. (2022). Cognitive warfare: The mental dimensions of hybrid conflict. NATO Review. This contemporary article explores how mechanisms of groupthink and polarization are exploited in conflicts, illustrating fanatical dynamics on a macro scale.
Haslam, S. A., & Reicher, S. D. (2012). When prisoners take over the prison: A social psychology of resistance. Personality and Social Psychology Review. This analysis of the Stanford experiments and other studies shows how group dynamics can lead ordinary individuals to adopt extreme behaviors, highlighting the power of social context.

Share this with someone who needs to read it: